Word analysis

Luke 19:47: ^CA jah was laisjands daga ƕammeh in þizai alh: iþ þai auhmistans gudjans jah bokarjos sokidedun ina usqistjan jah þai frumistans manageins.; — καὶ ἦν διδάσκων τὸ καθ' ἡμέραν ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ. οἱ δὲ ἀρχιερεῖς καὶ οἱ γραμματεῖς ἐζήτουν αὐτὸν ἀπολέσαι καὶ οἱ πρῶτοι τοῦ λαοῦ:; — Et erat docens quotidie in templo. Principes autem sacerdotum, et scribæ, et princeps plebis quærebant illum perdere :; — And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him,; — En Hij leerde dagelijks in den tempel; en de overpriesters, en de Schriftgeleerden, en de oversten des volks zochten Hem te doden.; — Il enseignait tous les jours dans le temple. Et les principaux sacrificateurs, les scribes, et les principaux du peuple cherchaient à le faire périr;

↑ jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma jah : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable) (more)
WS 1910: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ was

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma wisan : Verb (inflection: abl.V.5) (more)
WS 1910: sein, dasein, existieren [nicht perfektivierbares Durativ]
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
Lemma wisan : Verb (inflection: abl.V.5) (more)
WS 1910: [mit u. ohne "waila"] sich freuen, schwelgen, schmausen
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular
Lemma wisan : Verb (inflection: abl.V.5) (more)
WS 1910: weilen, bleiben
- Active Indicative Preterite 1st Person Singular
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Singular

Status: not verified, lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ laisjands

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma laisjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i) (more)
WS 1910: lehren – [reflexiv:] "laisjan sik": lernen
- Present participle: Strong Masculine Nominative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ daga

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma dags : Noun, common, masculine (inflection: Ma) (more)
WS 1910: Tag: "daga ƕammeh": täglich; "daga jah daga": tagtäglich; "dag hindar daga": Tag für Tag; "himma daga": heute
- Dative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ ƕammeh

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma ƕazuh : Pronoun, indefinite (inflection: Pron.) (more)
WS 1910: jeder – [Adjektivisch bei Zeitangaben (283)]: "jera ƕammeh": jährlich; "daga ƕammeh": täglich – [m. Kardinalien zur Bildung der Distributiva (195b)]: "twans ƕanzuh": je zwei
- Neuter Dative Singular
- Masculine Dative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ in

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma in : Preposition, +ADG (inflection: Indeclinable) (more)
WS 1910: I. [m. Dativ] in, auf, an, unter [Ruhe] II. [m. Akkusativ] in, auf, nach, zu [Richtung] III. [m. Genitiv] wegen, um __ willen, für, durch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ þizai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma sa : Pronoun, demonstrative (inflection: Pron.) (more)
WS 1910: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
- Feminine Dative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ alh

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma alhs : Noun, common, feminine (inflection: Fkons) (more)
WS 1910: Tempel
- Accusative Singular
- Dative Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ iþ

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma iþ : Conjunction (inflection: Indeclinable) (more)
WS 1910: 1. [Konj., stets an der Spitze des Satzes (334)] aber 2. [Zur einleitung konjunktionsloser Bedingungssätze (370a)]

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ þai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma sa : Pronoun, demonstrative (inflection: Pron.) (more)
WS 1910: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
- Masculine Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ auhmistans

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma auhumists : Adjective, Superlative (inflection: Superlative) (more)
WS 1910: höchster
- Weak Masculine Accusative Plural
- Weak Masculine Nominative Plural
- Strong Masculine Accusative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ gudjans

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma gudja : Noun, common, masculine (inflection: Mn) (more)
WS 1910: Priester
- Accusative Plural
- Nominative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma jah : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable) (more)
WS 1910: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ bokarjos

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma bokareis : Noun, common, masculine (inflection: Mia) (more)
WS 1910: Schriftgelehrter; Schreiber [Neap. Urk.]
- Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ sokidedun

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma sokjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i) (more)
WS 1910: 1. suchen 2. disputieren
- Active Indicative Preterite 3rd Person Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ ina

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma is : Pronoun, personal (inflection: Pron.) (more)
WS 1910: ‘er, der’
- Masculine Accusative Singular

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ usqistjan

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma us-qistjan : Verb (inflection: sw.V.1-i) (more)
WS 1910: verderben, umbringen
- Infinitive

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ jah

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma jah : Unassigned (inflection: Indeclinable) (more)
WS 1910: und, und zwar, auch

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ þai

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma sa : Pronoun, demonstrative (inflection: Pron.) (more)
WS 1910: [Pronomen der ‘der’- und ‘ich’-Deixis (281.1),] der, dieser – [Nicht selten ohne griech. Entsprechung.] – [Das Dem. dient als Ersatz des gr. Artikels (281,2).]
- Masculine Nominative Plural

Status: not verified but unambiguous.

↑ frumistans

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma frumists : Adjective, Superlative (inflection: Superlative) (more)
WS 1910: 'primus'
- Strong Masculine Accusative Plural
- Weak Masculine Accusative Plural
- Weak Masculine Nominative Plural

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.

↑ manageins

Codex Argenteus, facs. 267 (fol. 105r)

Lemma managei : Noun, common, feminine (inflection: Fn) (more)
WS 1910: Menge
- Accusative Plural
- Nominative Plural
- Genitive Singular

Status: not verified, morphosyntactically ambiguous.